Dava, mal\u0131n ay\u0131pl\u0131 olmas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden d\u00f6nme ve bedel iadesi talebine ili\u015fkindir. Davac\u0131 arac\u0131n ay\u0131pl\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden d\u00f6nerek ara\u00e7 bedelinin iadesine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015f, daval\u0131 ithalat\u00e7\u0131 \u015firket ise davac\u0131n\u0131n ithalat\u00e7\u0131 olan \u015firketlerine kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden d\u00f6nme ve bedel iadesi talebinde bulunamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015ftur. 6502 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcketici\u2019nin Korunmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Kanun\u2019un 11\/1.maddesinde t\u00fcketicinin mal\u0131n ay\u0131pl\u0131 oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde kullanabilece\u011fi se\u00e7imlik haklar\u0131 s\u0131ralanm\u0131\u015f ve t\u00fcketicinin bu se\u00e7imlik haklar\u0131ndan birini kullanabilece\u011fi, sat\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n ise t\u00fcketicinin tercih etti\u011fi bu talebi yerine getirmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc oldu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015ftir. 11\/2.maddesinde ise; \u2018\u2018\u00dccretsiz onar\u0131m veya mal\u0131n ay\u0131ps\u0131z misli ile de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi haklar\u0131 \u00fcretici veya ithalat\u00e7\u0131ya kar\u015f\u0131 da kullan\u0131labilir. Bu f\u0131kradaki haklar\u0131n yerine getirilmesi konusunda sat\u0131c\u0131, \u00fcretici ve ithalat\u00e7\u0131 m\u00fcteselsilen sorumludur.\u2019\u2019 denilerek ithalat\u00e7\u0131ya kar\u015f\u0131 kullan\u0131labilecek se\u00e7imlik haklar g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir. Ancak kanunun 11\/2.maddesinin ayn\u0131 kanunun 56.maddesiyle birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir. Kanunun 56\/3.maddesinde; \u2018\u2018T\u00fcketici bu Kanunun 11 inci maddesinde belirtilen se\u00e7imlik haklar\u0131ndan onar\u0131m hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanm\u0131\u015fsa, mal\u0131n garanti s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde tekrar ar\u0131zalanmas\u0131 veya tamiri i\u00e7in gereken azami s\u00fcrenin a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 veya tamirinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00e2llerinde 11 inci maddede yer alan di\u011fer se\u00e7imlik haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullanabilir. Sat\u0131c\u0131 t\u00fcketicinin talebini reddedemez. Bu talebin yerine getirilmemesi durumunda sat\u0131c\u0131, \u00fcretici ve ithalat\u00e7\u0131 m\u00fcteselsilen sorumludur.\u2019\u2019 denilmekte ve t\u00fcketicinin di\u011fer se\u00e7imlik haklar\u0131ndan ithalat\u00e7\u0131n\u0131n da sorumlu olaca\u011f\u0131 durumlar d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Yukar\u0131daki a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay incelendi\u011finde \u0130lk derece mahkemesince, 28\/12\/2016 tarihli rapor h\u00fckme esas al\u0131narak davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile arac\u0131n daval\u0131ya iadesine, 60.090,64 TL\u2019nin 20\/03\/2012\u2019den i\u015fleyecek ticari faizi ile i\u015fleyecek daval\u0131dan al\u0131n\u0131p davac\u0131ya verilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. \u0130lk derece mahkemesinin karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015ftur. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince; konusunda uzman bilirki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan gizli ay\u0131pl\u0131 olarak nitelenen ar\u0131zalar\u0131n servis taraf\u0131ndan giderilemedi\u011fi davac\u0131n\u0131n 6502 say\u0131l\u0131 yasada belirlenen se\u00e7imlik haklar\u0131ndan olan bedel iadesini talep edebilece\u011fi bu itibarla daval\u0131n\u0131n bu y\u00f6ne ili\u015fkin istinaf itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f, arac\u0131n davac\u0131 kullan\u0131m\u0131nda iken kazaya kar\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle 5.000,00 TL de\u011fer kayb\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu miktar\u0131n davac\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131ndan mahsubunun gerekece\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan alaca\u011f\u0131na arac\u0131n daval\u0131ya iade tarihinden itibaren faiz i\u015fletilmesi gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile daval\u0131n\u0131n istinaf itiraz\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f ise de h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporunda bir yandan ara\u00e7la yap\u0131lan test s\u00fcr\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde ara\u00e7ta herhangi bir teknik ar\u0131za ile kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtmi\u015f bir yandan da davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan dosyaya ibraz edilen CD kay\u0131t g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri ve servis kay\u0131tlar\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek arac\u0131n imalattan kaynaklanan gizli ay\u0131pl\u0131 oldu\u011fu kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup bilirki\u015fi raporu bu haliyle yetersiz olup h\u00fck\u00fcm kurmaya elveri\u015fli de\u011fildir. Hal b\u00f6yle olunca; B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince, konusunda uzman yeni bir bilirki\u015fi heyeti olu\u015fturularak taraf, mahkeme ve Yarg\u0131tay denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k ve yeterli bilirki\u015fi raporu al\u0131narak, al\u0131nan rapor sonucuna g\u00f6re de 6502 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcketicinin Korunmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Kanun\u2019un 11\/2. ve 56\/3.maddesinin de\u011ferlendirilerek, daval\u0131 ithalat\u00e7\u0131 firman\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden d\u00f6nme ve bedelin iadesi talebi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden sorunmlu olup, olmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tart\u0131\u015f\u0131larak sonucuna g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi gerekirken, eksik incelemeyle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, bozma nedenidir (Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi – K.2020\/6974).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u0130thalat\u00e7\u0131 Firman\u0131n Ay\u0131pl\u0131 Maldan Sorumlulu\u011fu Dava, mal\u0131n ay\u0131pl\u0131 olmas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden d\u00f6nme ve bedel iadesi talebine ili\u015fkindir. Davac\u0131 arac\u0131n ay\u0131pl\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden d\u00f6nerek ara\u00e7 bedelinin iadesine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015f, daval\u0131 ithalat\u00e7\u0131 \u015firket ise davac\u0131n\u0131n ithalat\u00e7\u0131 olan \u015firketlerine kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden d\u00f6nme ve bedel iadesi talebinde bulunamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015ftur. 6502 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcketici\u2019nin Korunmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Kanun\u2019un 11\/1.maddesinde…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[65],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10817"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10817"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10817\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10818,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10817\/revisions\/10818"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10817"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10817"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10817"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}