Davac\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esinde; \u015eubat 2008 tarihinde v\u00fccudunun \u00e7e\u015fitli b\u00f6lgelerinde t\u00fcyleri tamamen bitmesi i\u00e7in lazer tedavisi konusunda \u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026 T\u0131p Merkezinde g\u00f6revli daval\u0131 doktor \u0130.. A.. ile 1.650,00 TL kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda anla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 7 ay boyunca daval\u0131 doktoru g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini, yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 di\u011fer daval\u0131 B.. A.. ile ayda 1 defa olmak \u00fczere 6 ay lazer tedavisine devam etti\u011fini, 7. seansta v\u00fccudunun \u00e7e\u015fitli yerlerinde yan\u0131klar meydana getirildi\u011fini, bir g\u00fcn sonra daval\u0131 doktora gitti\u011finde kendilerinin hatas\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, lekelerin ge\u00e7ece\u011fini bildirdiklerini, gitti\u011fi farkl\u0131 doktorlar\u0131n leke kalaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, uygulay\u0131c\u0131 hatas\u0131 bulundu\u011funu s\u00f6ylediklerini, yan\u0131k tan\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n konuldu\u011funu, anla\u015fma h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine uyulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ceza davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuruda bulundu\u011funu belirterek; 1.650,00 TL maddi ve 6.000,00 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n dava tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile birlikte tahsiline karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Taraflar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 ile dosyadaki bilgi ve belgeler birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki akdi ili\u015fkinin, TBK\u2019n\u0131n 470 (BK. m. 355) ve devam\u0131 maddelerinde d\u00fczenlenen eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Davac\u0131 taraf i\u015f-eser sahibi; daval\u0131 taraf ise y\u00fcklenicidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde, i\u015fin uzman\u0131 say\u0131lan y\u00fcklenici, yap\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 y\u00fcklendi\u011fi i\u015fi, \u00f6zen borcu gere\u011fi olarak fen ve sanat kurallar\u0131na, s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine, kendisine duyulan g\u00fcvene ve beklenen amaca uygun \u015fekilde yapmakla \u00f6devlidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini di\u011fer i\u015f g\u00f6rme s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinden ay\u0131ran \u00f6nemli \u00f6zelliklerinden birisi sonu\u00e7 sorumlulu\u011fu, yani taraflar\u0131n iradeleri do\u011frultusunda y\u00fcklenici taraf\u0131ndan bir sonucun meydana getirilmesi taahh\u00fcd\u00fcd\u00fcr. Zira; eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde bir eserin yarat\u0131l\u0131p teslim edilmesi borcu alt\u0131na girilmektedir. Bu borcun alt\u0131na giren taraf yani y\u00fcklenici, i\u015fin mahiyeti gere\u011fi i\u015fi sadakat ve \u00f6zenle yerine getirmek zorundad\u0131r. Sadakat borcu, y\u00fcklenicinin i\u015f sahibinin yarar\u0131na olacak \u015feyleri yapmas\u0131 ve ona zarar verecek her t\u00fcrl\u00fc eylemden ka\u00e7\u0131nmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Eserin, s\u00f6zle\u015fmede kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan niteliklerine, ya da i\u015f sahibinin bekledi\u011fi amaca uygun olmamas\u0131 veya l\u00fczumlu baz\u0131 vas\u0131flardan bir ya da bir ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 halinde ay\u0131pl\u0131 ifa edildi\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde y\u00fcklenici, belli bir sonucu (eser) taahh\u00fct etti\u011finden sonu\u00e7 ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi i\u00e7in davac\u0131 i\u015f sahibinin zarar g\u00f6rmemesi i\u00e7in mesleki t\u00fcm \u015fartlar\u0131 yerine getirmeli, somut durumun gerektirdi\u011fi tedbirleri noksans\u0131z bi\u00e7imde almal\u0131, uygun tedaviyi belirleyip uygulamal\u0131, uygulanan tedavide nadirde olsa g\u00f6r\u00fclebilecek olumsuz sonu\u00e7lara dair davac\u0131y\u0131 ayd\u0131nlat\u0131p uyarmal\u0131 ve davac\u0131n\u0131n bu hususta r\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131 alm\u0131\u015fsa, eserini i\u015f sahibi davac\u0131n\u0131n ondan bekledi\u011fi amaca uygun olarak tamamlayarak teslim etme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcndedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Somut olayda; davaya konu son seans i\u015fleminin 25\/08\/2009 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi, h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan Adli T\u0131p \u0130htisas Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor \u00f6ncesi davac\u0131n\u0131n 07\/09\/2011 tarihinde muayene edildi\u011fi, olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesinden iki y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015fk\u0131n s\u00fcre sonra yap\u0131lan muayene sonucu ve dosyadaki belge, foto\u011fraf, cd i\u00e7eriklerine g\u00f6re rapor d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Oysa bu rapor manevi tazminat y\u00f6n\u00fcnden h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nacak nitelikte de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Dava konusu eylem nedeniyle ba\u015flat\u0131lan ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 kapmas\u0131nda; davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda Adana \u0130l Sa\u011fl\u0131k M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Adli T\u0131p Birimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 1.9.2009 tarihli 24540 say\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7ici raporda;\u201d lazer epilasyona ba\u011fl\u0131 yan\u0131k olu\u015ftu\u011fu \u015fikayeti ile geldi\u011fi, sa\u011f \u00e7ene alt\u0131nda, sol kol sol koltuk alt\u0131, sol el \u00fczerinde \u00e7ok say\u0131da yakla\u015f\u0131k 0.5cm.lik yayg\u0131n yan\u0131klar mevcut oldu\u011funun belirtildi\u011fi, Adana Adli T\u0131p \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn 1.9.2009 tarihli 8400 say\u0131l\u0131 raporunda ise;\u201d sa\u011f \u00e7enede sol el s\u0131rt\u0131 \u00f6n kol koltuk alt\u0131nda \u00e7ok say\u0131da yakla\u015f\u0131k 0.5cm uzunlu\u011funda \u00e7izgisel tarzda lazer epilasyon yan\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeni ile getirildi\u011fi kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, ek patoloji bildirilmedi\u011fine g\u00f6re ya\u015famsal tehlike olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilecek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde hafif nitelikte oldu\u011funun belirtildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Dinlenen tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131na g\u00f6re; davac\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 D.. K..\u2019\u00fcn beyan\u0131nda; davac\u0131n\u0131n tedavi g\u00f6ren yerlerinin yan\u0131k i\u00e7erisinde oldu\u011funu, sonradan v\u00fccudunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu sebeple polislik s\u0131nav\u0131na giremedi\u011fini, davac\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 N.. G..\u2019\u00fcn beyan\u0131nda; yan\u0131klar\u0131n oldu\u011fu g\u00fcn davac\u0131n\u0131n evinde olduklar\u0131n\u0131, tedaviden sonra yan\u0131klar\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011funu, davac\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 Sevgin K\u00fcnlev beyan\u0131nda; tedaviden geldi\u011finde yan\u0131klar i\u00e7erisinde oldu\u011funu ifade ettikleri g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ki\u015filik haklar\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011frayan kimse, manevi tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesini isteyebilir. Hakim, manevi tazminat\u0131n miktar\u0131n\u0131 tayin ederken sald\u0131r\u0131 te\u015fkil eden eylem ve olay\u0131n \u00f6zelli\u011fi yan\u0131nda taraflar\u0131n kusur oran\u0131n\u0131, s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131, i\u015fgal ettikleri makam\u0131 ve di\u011fer sosyal ve ekonomik durumlar\u0131n\u0131 da dikkate almal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Miktar\u0131n belirlenmesinde her olaya g\u00f6re de\u011fi\u015febilecek \u00f6zel hal ve \u015fartlar\u0131n bulunaca\u011f\u0131 da g\u00f6zetilerek, takdir hakk\u0131n\u0131 etkileyecek nedenleri karar yerinde objektif olarak g\u00f6stermelidir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc, kanunun takdir hakk\u0131 verdi\u011fi hususlarda hakimin hukuka ve hakkaniyete g\u00f6re h\u00fck\u00fcm verece\u011fi T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu\u2019nun 4.maddesinde belirtilmi\u015ftir. H\u00fckmedilecek bu para, zarara u\u011frayanda manevi huzuru do\u011furmay\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirecek tazminata benzer bir fonksiyonu olan \u00f6zg\u00fcn bir nitelik ta\u015f\u0131r. Bir ceza olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 hukukuna ili\u015fkin bir zarar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131 da ama\u00e7 edinmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
O halde bu tazminat\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 onun amac\u0131na g\u00f6re belirlenmelidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Takdir edilecek miktar, mevcut halde elde edilmek istenilen tatmin duygusunun etkisine ula\u015fmak i\u00e7in gerekli olan kadar olmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, daval\u0131lar\u0131n uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hatal\u0131 lazer epilasyon i\u015flemi sonucunda, davac\u0131 i\u015f sahibinin istedi\u011fi sonuca ula\u015famad\u0131\u011f\u0131, v\u00fccudunda yan\u0131klar meydana geldi\u011fi, \u00e7ekti\u011fi s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131 ve \u0131zd\u0131rap da dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, davac\u0131 lehine uygun oranda manevi tazminata karar verilmesi gerekirken, yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme sonucu manevi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir (Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi – Karar : 2015\/15750).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u0131p Merkezinde Lazer Epilasyon (G\u00fczellik Uygulamas\u0131) ve Eser S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi Davac\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esinde; \u015eubat 2008 tarihinde v\u00fccudunun \u00e7e\u015fitli b\u00f6lgelerinde t\u00fcyleri tamamen bitmesi i\u00e7in lazer tedavisi konusunda \u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026 T\u0131p Merkezinde g\u00f6revli daval\u0131 doktor \u0130.. A.. ile 1.650,00 TL kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda anla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 7 ay boyunca daval\u0131 doktoru g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini, yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 di\u011fer daval\u0131 B.. A.. ile ayda 1 defa olmak \u00fczere…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[64],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10799"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10799"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10799\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10800,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10799\/revisions\/10800"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10799"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10799"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10799"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}