Dava, meslek hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucu \u00f6len sigortal\u0131n\u0131n hak sahiplerinin manevi zararlar\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesi istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece; davac\u0131lar\u0131n murisinin yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 meslek hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 sebebiyle maddi tazminat talebinde bulundu\u011fu, manevi tazminat\u0131na dair bir talebinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu sebeple davac\u0131lar\u0131n da, \u00f6lenin yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 meslek hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 sebebiyle manevi tazminat talep edemeyecekleri gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f olup bu karar s\u00fcresinde davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Dosyadaki kay\u0131t ve belgelerden; davac\u0131lar\u0131n murisinin, 29.3.1983 – 13.9.2005 tarihleri aras\u0131nda daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde kal\u0131plama b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, burada kumu \u00f6zel tahta kal\u0131plara d\u00f6kerek d\u00f6k\u00fcm kal\u0131plar\u0131 elde etti\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n meslek hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131na yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu sebeple de i\u015f g\u00fcc\u00fc kayb\u0131 olu\u015ftu\u011funun \u0130stanbul Meslek Hastal\u0131klar\u0131 Hastanesi ile Dr. L\u00fctfi K\u0131rdar Kartal E\u011fitim ve Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Hastanesinin raporlar\u0131yla sabit oldu\u011fu, \u0130stanbul Meslek Hastal\u0131klar\u0131 Hastanesinin 22.5.2007 tarihli m\u00fctalas\u0131nda. \u201csigortal\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn pn\u00f6monkonyoz meslek hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve komplikasyonlar\u0131ndan oldu\u011funun\u201d belirtildi\u011fi, 30.7.2003 tarihli i\u015f m\u00fcfetti\u015fi raporunda; i\u015fyerinde meslek hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 meydana gelmesinde daval\u0131 i\u015fverenin %90 oran\u0131nda kusurlu oldu\u011fu, %10 oran\u0131nda da ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmazl\u0131k oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, SGK\u2019n\u0131n sigortal\u0131ya maluliyeti sebebiyle gelir ba\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, daha sonra kusurlu oldu\u011funu belirtti\u011fi daval\u0131 i\u015fveren aleyhine dava a\u00e7arak faiziyle tahsilini talep etti\u011fi, Kartal 1. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi\u2019nin 2004\/316 E. say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi heyeti raporunda meslek hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fumunda davac\u0131n\u0131n %90 oran\u0131nda kusurlu oldu\u011fu, olayda %10 ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmazl\u0131k bulundu\u011funun belirtildi\u011fi, bu bilirki\u015fi raporuna dayan\u0131larak verilen kabul karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay 10. Hukuk Dairesinin incelemesinden ge\u00e7erek 6.4.2009 tarihli ilamla onand\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, murisin sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmamas\u0131 sebebiyle miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n manevi tazminat talebinde bulunup bulunmayaca\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u00d6l\u00fcm hallerinde manevi tazminat\u0131n yasal dayana\u011f\u0131 B.K. 47. maddedir. Buna g\u00f6re \u201cHakim, hususi halleri nazara alarak cismani zarara d\u00fc\u00e7ar olan kimseye yahut adam \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc takdirde \u00f6l\u00fcn\u00fcn ailesine manevi zarar namiyle adalete muvaf\u0131k tazminat verilmesine karar verebilir.\u201d Manevi tazminata h\u00fckmedebilmek i\u00e7in ortada bir manevi zarar olmal\u0131d\u0131r. Manevi zarar, malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan de\u011ferlerin yani ki\u015fi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlerinin zedelenmesi sonucu do\u011fan rahats\u0131zl\u0131k, duyulan elem ve ac\u0131 (\u0131zd\u0131rap) olarak g\u00f6z\u00fckmektedir. Manevi tazminat ise, zarar g\u00f6renin ki\u015fi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlerindeki zedelenme sonucu olu\u015fan elem ve ac\u0131n\u0131n (rahats\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n) genellikle \u00f6denen bir tazminatla de\u011ferlendirilmesinden ibarettir. \u00d6l\u00fcm halinde bundan \u00e7ok ciddi surette elem duyacak kimseler vard\u0131r. Manevi tazminat isteyecek olan kimseler, \u00f6l\u00fcmden son derece \u00fcz\u00fcnt\u00fc ve elem duyan kimselerdir. \u00d6l\u00fcmden hakikaten elem duyacak olanlar \u00f6l\u00fcn\u00fcn yak\u0131nlar\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u00d6lenin, davac\u0131lardan Nazmiye\u2019nin e\u015fi, di\u011fer davac\u0131lar\u0131n da babas\u0131 oldu\u011fu, 22 y\u0131l 6 ay daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve meslek hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131na yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131, 46 ya\u015f\u0131nda meslek hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, i\u015fverenin kusurlu oldu\u011fu, davac\u0131lar\u0131n manevi tazminat talep ederken hem murisin hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6neminde \u00e7ekti\u011fi ac\u0131lar, hem de murisin meslek hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak vefat\u0131 sebebine dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Davac\u0131lar\u0131n, murislerinin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc sebebiyle elem ve ac\u0131 \u00e7ektikleri, buna g\u00f6re manevi zararlar\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011fu, bu sebeple a\u00e7\u0131lan manevi tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n hakl\u0131 oldu\u011fu ortadad\u0131r (Yarg\u0131tay 21. Hukuk Dairesi – Karar : 2012\/8520).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Meslek Hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 Tazminat Davas\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131ktan Sonra \u00d6l\u00fcm ve Yak\u0131nlar\u0131n Manevi Tazminat \u0130stemi Dava, meslek hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucu \u00f6len sigortal\u0131n\u0131n hak sahiplerinin manevi zararlar\u0131n\u0131n giderilmesi istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece; davac\u0131lar\u0131n murisinin yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 meslek hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 sebebiyle maddi tazminat talebinde bulundu\u011fu, manevi tazminat\u0131na dair bir talebinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu sebeple davac\u0131lar\u0131n da, \u00f6lenin yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 meslek hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 sebebiyle manevi tazminat talep edemeyecekleri…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[64],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10753"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10753"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10753\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10754,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10753\/revisions\/10754"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10753"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10753"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10753"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}