{"id":10732,"date":"2022-06-15T06:53:32","date_gmt":"2022-06-15T06:53:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/?p=10732"},"modified":"2022-06-15T06:53:34","modified_gmt":"2022-06-15T06:53:34","slug":"yargitay-9-hukuk-dairesi-2020-7253-e-2021-5699-k","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2022\/06\/15\/yargitay-9-hukuk-dairesi-2020-7253-e-2021-5699-k\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi 2020\/7253 E. 2021\/5699 K."},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h3 class=\"has-text-align-center\">T.C.<br>Yarg\u0131tay<br>9. Hukuk Dairesi<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Esas No:2020\/7253<\/strong><br><strong>Karar No:2021\/5699<\/strong><br><strong>K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>9. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2020\/7253 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2021\/5699 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong>&nbsp;:\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili ile daval\u0131 &#8230; Santrali Enerji Yat. Elek. \u00dcret. Ltd. \u015eti. vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>1- Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, toplanan delillerle karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanuni gerektirici sebeplere g\u00f6re davac\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm, daval\u0131 &#8230; Santrali Enerji Yat. Elek. \u00dcret. Ltd. \u015eti.&#8217;nin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan t\u00fcm temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir.<br>2- Mahkemece, daval\u0131 &#8230; Santrali Enerji Yat. Elek. \u00dcret. Ltd. \u015eti. y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n husumetten reddine karar verilmesine ra\u011fmen davac\u0131 lehine h\u00fckmedilen vekalet \u00fccretinden daval\u0131 &#8230; Santrali Enerji Yat. Elek. \u00dcret. Ltd. \u015eti.&#8217;nin sorumlu tutulmas\u0131 hatal\u0131 olup bozma sebebi ise de, bu yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi yeniden yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 gerektirmedi\u011finden h\u00fckm\u00fcn Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun ge\u00e7ici 3\/1. maddesi yollamas\u0131 ile Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 438\/7. maddesi uyar\u0131nca d\u00fczeltilerek onanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<br>Sonu\u00e7:<br>H\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131 lehine h\u00fckmedilen vekalet \u00fccretine ili\u015fkin paragraf\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131larak, yerine;<br>&#8216;Davac\u0131 kendisini vekil ile temsil ettirdi\u011finden, karar tarihinde ge\u00e7erli Avukatl\u0131k Asgari \u00dccret Tarifesi&#8217;ne g\u00f6re toplam 7.942.85&nbsp;<strong>TL<\/strong>&nbsp;nispi vekalet \u00fccretinin, daval\u0131 Oldum Elektro Mekanik Enerji Santralleri End. Ltd. \u015eti.&#8217;den al\u0131n\u0131p davac\u0131ya verilmesine,&#8221; paragraf\u0131n\u0131n yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu \u015fekilde&nbsp;<strong>D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK<\/strong><strong>ONANMASINA<\/strong>, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde daval\u0131 &#8230; Santrali Enerji Yat. Elek. \u00dcret. Ltd. \u015eti.&#8217;ye iadesine, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 temyiz giderinin temyiz eden davac\u0131 tarafa y\u00fckletilmesine,&nbsp;<strong>08\/03\/2021&nbsp;<\/strong>g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C.Yarg\u0131tay9. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2020\/7253Karar No:2021\/5699K. Tarihi: 9. Hukuk Dairesi &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2020\/7253 E. &nbsp;, &nbsp;2021\/5699 K. MAHKEMES\u0130&nbsp;:\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili ile daval\u0131 &#8230; Santrali Enerji Yat. Elek. \u00dcret. Ltd. \u015eti. vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[63],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10732"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10732"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10732\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10733,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10732\/revisions\/10733"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10732"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10732"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10732"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}