Esas No:2021\/2027<\/strong> 9. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/2027 E. , 2021\/5722 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong> : Kayseri 7. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n\n\n\n Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmi\u015f ve daval\u0131 vekilince duru\u015fma talep edilmi\u015f ise de; 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 369. maddesi gere\u011fince duru\u015fma iste\u011finin miktardan reddine ve incelemenin dosya \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildikten sonra Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor sunuldu, dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I<\/p>\n\n\n\n Davac\u0131 \u0130steminin \u00d6zeti: T.C.Yarg\u0131tay9. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2021\/2027Karar No:2021\/5722K. Tarihi: 9. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/2027 E. , 2021\/5722 K. MAHKEMES\u0130 : Kayseri 7. Hukuk Dairesi Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmi\u015f ve daval\u0131 vekilince duru\u015fma talep edilmi\u015f ise de; 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 369. maddesi gere\u011fince duru\u015fma iste\u011finin miktardan reddine ve incelemenin…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[63],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10730"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10730"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10730\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10731,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10730\/revisions\/10731"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10730"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10730"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10730"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2021\/5722<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; m\u00fcvekkilinin 25.02.2005 <\/strong>– 14.03.2017 <\/strong>tarihleri aras\u0131nda daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde uluslararas\u0131 t\u0131r \u015fof\u00f6r\u00fc olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f akdini maa\u015f, hafta tatili, genel tatil \u00fccretlerinin \u00f6denmemesi sebebiyle hakl\u0131 olarak 14.03.2017 <\/strong>tarihinde feshetti\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00fccretinin asgar\u00ee \u00fccret + sefer priminden olu\u015ftu\u011funu, Avrupa seferlerinde 700,00 Euro, A**** *** ise 150,00 Euro sefer primi al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, y\u0131ll\u0131k izinlerinin kulland\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, genel tatil g\u00fcnlerindeki \u00fccretlerin \u00f6denmedi\u011fini iddia ederek bir k\u0131s\u0131m i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.
Daval\u0131 Cevab\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:
Daval\u0131 vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; davac\u0131n\u0131n kendisinin i\u015ften ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, devams\u0131zl\u0131k yapmas\u0131 nedeniyle ihtarname ke\u015fide edildi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00fccretinin asgari \u00fccret oldu\u011funu, seferlerde \u00f6denen tutarlar\u0131n ara\u00e7 ve yol masraf\u0131 oldu\u011funu, genel tatillerde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na dair i\u015fverenin herhangi bir talimat\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.
\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:
\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince, toplanan kan\u0131tlar ve bilirki\u015fi raporuna dayan\u0131larak, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.
\u0130stinaf Ba\u015fvurusu :
\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, taraf vekilleri istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.
B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti :
B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve esas y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hukuka uygun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle, taraflar\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.
Temyiz Ba\u015fvurusu:
Karar\u0131, taraf vekilleri temyiz etmi\u015ftir.
Gerek\u00e7e:
1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara toplanan delillerle karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanuni gerektirici sebeplere g\u00f6re, taraflar\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.
2- Taraflar aras\u0131nda i\u015f\u00e7inin kulland\u0131r\u0131lmayan izin s\u00fcrelerine ait alaca\u011f\u0131 bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ihtilafl\u0131d\u0131r.
4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 59. maddesinde, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin herhangi bir nedenle sona ermesi halinde, i\u015f\u00e7iye kulland\u0131r\u0131lmayan y\u0131ll\u0131k izin s\u00fcrelerine ait \u00fccretlerin son \u00fccret \u00fczerinden \u00f6denece\u011fi h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Y\u0131ll\u0131k izin hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u00fccrete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmesi i\u00e7in i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshi \u015fartt\u0131r. Bu noktada, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin sona erme \u015feklinin ve hakl\u0131 nedene dayan\u0131p dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nemi bulunmamaktad\u0131r.
Y\u0131ll\u0131k izinlerin kulland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda ispat y\u00fck\u00fc i\u015fverene aittir. \u0130\u015fveren y\u0131ll\u0131k izinlerin kulland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 imzal\u0131 izin defteri veya e\u015fde\u011fer bir belge ile kan\u0131tlamal\u0131d\u0131r.
6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 31. maddesinde, hakimin davay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatma \u00f6devi d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olup, madde uyar\u0131nca, hakimin uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda, maddi veya hukuki a\u00e7\u0131dan belirsiz yahut \u00e7eli\u015fkili g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hususlar hakk\u0131nda, taraflara a\u00e7\u0131klama yapt\u0131rabilece\u011fi, soru sorabilece\u011fi ve delil g\u00f6sterilmesini isteyebilece\u011fi d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.
Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta, daval\u0131ya ait i\u015fyerinde 12 y\u0131l 19 g\u00fcn \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 bulunan davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi boyunca hi\u00e7 izin kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul\u00fcne g\u00f6re y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 alacak hesab\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi boyunca hi\u00e7 \u00fccretli izin kullanmamas\u0131 hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fundan, hakimin 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 31. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen davay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatma \u00f6devi \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde; Mahkemece, davac\u0131 asilin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi boyunca \u00fccretli izin kullan\u0131p kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kullanm\u0131\u015f ise ka\u00e7 g\u00fcn y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda beyan\u0131 al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekirken, eksik inceleme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi hatal\u0131d\u0131r.
3- Davac\u0131n\u0131n dava dilek\u00e7esinde i\u015fe girerken al\u0131nan teminat senedinin iptaline ili\u015fkin talebi bulunmaktaysa da Mahkemece bu talep hakk\u0131nda, karar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm k\u0131sm\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a bir h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi taleple ilgili gerek\u00e7e de olu\u015fturulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durum Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 297\/2. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.
SONU\u00c7<\/strong>:Temyiz olunan \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n ve bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131 esastan reddeden B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n, yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 sebeplerden dolay\u0131 BOZULARAK<\/strong>ORTADAN<\/strong>KALDIRILMASINA<\/strong>, dosyan\u0131n karar\u0131 veren \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesine, bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ise karar\u0131 veren B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz karar harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde ilgililere iadesine, 08.03.2021 <\/strong>tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"