Esas No:2021\/1486<\/strong> \u0131n9. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/1486 E. , 2021\/5725 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong> :Asliye Hukuk (\u0130\u015f) Mahkemesi Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I<\/p>\n\n\n\n Davac\u0131 \u0130steminin \u00d6zeti: T.C.Yarg\u0131tay9. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2021\/1486Karar No:2021\/5725K. Tarihi: \u0131n9. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/1486 E. , 2021\/5725 K. MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk (\u0130\u015f) Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi daval\u0131lar … ve …Dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k M\u00fch. Mim. \u0130n\u015f. Taah. G\u0131da Hay. San. ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[63],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10728"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10728"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10728\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10729,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10728\/revisions\/10729"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10728"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10728"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2021\/5725<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi daval\u0131lar … ve …Dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k M\u00fch. Mim. \u0130n\u015f. Taah. G\u0131da Hay. San. ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Davac\u0131 vekili \u00f6zetle, daval\u0131 …Dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k M\u00fch. Ltd. \u015eti. ile … Belde Belediyesi aras\u0131nda s\u00f6zle\u015fme akdederek yol kenar\u0131ndaki ta\u015f d\u00f6\u015femeleri i\u015fi konusunda anla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, di\u011fer daval\u0131 …’n\u0131n bu i\u015f i\u00e7in i\u015f\u00e7i bulup Samsun’a getirdi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkilinin de bu ki\u015filer aras\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilinin 2013 y\u0131l\u0131 Kas\u0131m ay\u0131nda 2 ay \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 2014 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n N**** *** 4 ay daha ta\u015f duvar d\u00f6\u015feme i\u015finde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yevmiyesi 100,00 TL<\/strong> den anla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, ancak m\u00fcvekkilinin \u00f6denmeyen 9.000,00 TL<\/strong> \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011funu, …Ltd. \u015eti. her ne kadar …ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 ise de \u015firketin as\u0131l i\u015fvereninin … oldu\u011funu, …’\u0131n cezaevine girmesi sonras\u0131nda \u015firketin faaliyetlerinin de durdu\u011funu, bu sebeple …’\u0131n da \u00f6denmeyen i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131ndan sorumlu oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek; \u00f6denmeyen 9.000,00 TL<\/strong> \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n faiziyle birlikte daval\u0131lardan tahsilinin h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.
Daval\u0131 Cevab\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:
Daval\u0131lar … ve …Dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k M\u00fch. Mim. \u0130n\u015f. Taah. G\u0131da Hay. San. ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. Vekili \u00f6zetle, mahkemenin yetkili olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, …’\u0131n \u015fahsen sorumlu g\u00f6sterilmesinin hukuken m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkili \u015firket ile … aras\u0131nda herhangi bir ili\u015fki bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkili \u015firket \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 da olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak, davan\u0131n reddini talep etmi\u015ftir.
Daval\u0131 … \u00f6zetle, …’\u0131n talebi \u00fczerine ta\u015f duvar \u00f6rme i\u015fi i\u00e7in Samsun …’ye i\u015f\u00e7i g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, davac\u0131n\u0131n da bu i\u015f\u00e7ilerden biri oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6demekle beraber \u00f6denmeyen 9.000,00 TL<\/strong> \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131 bulundu\u011funu, kendisinin … vekili olarak hareket etti\u011fini savunarak hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n reddini talep etmi\u015ftir.
Mahkeme Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:
Mahkemece, toplan\u0131lan delillere dayan\u0131larak, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131lar nezdinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak dava konusu edilen \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 alamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131 tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n iddias\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frulad\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131 …’n\u0131n da davac\u0131n\u0131n iddias\u0131n\u0131 kabul etti\u011fi, daval\u0131lar\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131ndan m\u00fcteselsilen sorumlu olduklar\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.
Temyiz:
Karar\u0131, daval\u0131lar … ve …Dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k M\u00fch. Mim. \u0130n\u015f. Taah. G\u0131da Hay. San. ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.
Gerek\u00e7e:
Daval\u0131 …Dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k M\u00fch. Mim. \u0130n\u015f. Taah. G\u0131da Hayv. San. ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. y\u00f6n\u00fcnden;
6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun ge\u00e7ici 3. madde 1. f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re; ‘B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemelerinin, 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5235 say\u0131l\u0131 A**** *** \u0130lk Derece Mahkemeleri ile B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemelerinin Kurulu\u015f, G\u00f6rev ve Yetkileri Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun ge\u00e7ici 2’nci maddesi uyar\u0131nca Resm\u00ee Gazete’de ilan edilecek g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihine kadar, 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun temyize ili\u015fkin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunur.’ 2. f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemelerinin g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihinden \u00f6nce aleyhine temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015f olan kararlar hakk\u0131nda, kesinle\u015finceye kadar 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 26\/09\/2004 <\/strong>tarihli ve 5236 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikten \u00f6nceki 427 il\u00e2 454’\u00fcnc\u00fc madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunur. Yine ge\u00e7ici 1. madde 2. f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re; ‘Bu Kanunun, senetle ispat, istinaf ve temyiz ile temyizde duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin parasal s\u0131n\u0131rlarla ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmleri Kanunun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesinden \u00f6nceki tarihte a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan dava ve i\u015flerde uygulanmaz.’
5521 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Mahkemeleri Kanunu’nun 5.maddesine g\u00f6re i\u015f mahkemesinden verilen kararlar tefhim ve tebli\u011f tarihinden itibaren 8 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde temyiz olunabilir. Bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin hakime havale edildikten sonra temyiz defterine kayd\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Temyiz s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde temyiz dilek\u00e7esi temyiz defterine kaydedilmi\u015f, ancak har\u00e7 yat\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ise, har\u00e7 ve temyiz giderlerinin yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ilgili tarafa Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 434\/3. maddesi gere\u011fi 7 g\u00fcnl\u00fck kesin s\u00fcre verilmesi gerekir. 8 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde temyiz edilmeyen (HUMK<\/strong>.432\/4), temyiz defterine kayd\u0131 yap\u0131lmayan (HUMK<\/strong>. 434\/2) veya verilen kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde temyiz har\u00e7 ve gideri yat\u0131r\u0131lmayan (HUMK<\/strong>. 434\/3) kararlar kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olur.
Daval\u0131 \u015firketin s\u00fcresinde temyiz dilek\u00e7esi vermesine ra\u011fmen temyiz giderlerini kar\u015f\u0131lamamas\u0131 sebebiyle mahkemece usul\u00fcne uygun olarak muht\u0131ra \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, muht\u0131ran\u0131n 22.01.2021 tarihinde usul\u00fcnce tebli\u011f edilmesine ra\u011fmen, verilen 7 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde eksiklerin giderilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, daval\u0131 …Dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k M\u00fch. Mim. \u0130n\u015f. Taah. G\u0131da Hayv. San. ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eti.’nin temyiz talebinin Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 434\/3. maddesi gere\u011fince muht\u0131raya riayetsizlik nedeniyle REDD\u0130NE,
Daval\u0131 … y\u00f6n\u00fcnden;
1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, toplanan delillere karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanuni gerektirici sebeplere g\u00f6re, daval\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir.
2-Taraflar aras\u0131nda \u00f6denmeyen \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131ndan daval\u0131lar\u0131n sorumlulu\u011fu hususunda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmaktad\u0131r.
Somut olayda, davac\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esinde …Dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k M\u00fch. Ltd. \u015eti.’nin … Belde Belediyesinden ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ta\u015f d\u00f6\u015feme i\u015finde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u015firket her ne kadar …ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 ise de, as\u0131l i\u015fverenin … oldu\u011funu, zira …’\u0131n cezaevine girmesi sonras\u0131nda \u015firketin de faaliyetlerinin durdu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek, di\u011fer daval\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131s\u0131ra hem …Dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k M\u00fch. Mim. \u0130n\u015f. Taah. G\u0131da Hay. San. ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. hem de …’a husumet y\u00f6neltmi\u015ftir. 6360 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla … Belde Belediyesinin … Belediyesine ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, 07.09.2015 havele tarihli … Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131 ekinde yer alan belgeye g\u00f6re de, daval\u0131 …Dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k M\u00fch. Mim. \u0130n\u015f. Taah. G\u0131da Hay. San. ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. ile … Belediyesi aras\u0131nda, kent meydan\u0131 i\u015fine ait s\u00f6zle\u015fme imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakta olup, … Belediyesinin bahse konu yaz\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011finde de, davac\u0131n\u0131n 2013-2014 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda …Dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k M\u00fch. Mim. \u0130n\u015f. Taah. G\u0131da Hay. San. ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. nezdinde i\u015f\u00e7i olarak bildirildi\u011fi ifade edilmektedir. Dosyada yer alan belgelere ve davac\u0131n\u0131n dava dilek\u00e7esindeki kabul\u00fcne g\u00f6re de, daval\u0131 …Dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k M\u00fch. Mim. \u0130n\u015f. Taah. G\u0131da Hay. San. ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eti.’nin tek yetkilisinin dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 …oldu\u011fu, daval\u0131 …’\u0131n ise dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 Necla \u0130**** *** e\u015fi oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Her ne kadar dinlenilen davac\u0131 tan\u0131klar\u0131 ve di\u011fer daval\u0131 … beyanlar\u0131na g\u00f6re, i\u015fin … taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcklenildi\u011fi ve organize edildi\u011fi, yevmiyelerin onun taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6dendi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015f ise de, daval\u0131 …’\u0131n 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanunu’nun 2\/4. maddesinde tan\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, i\u015fyerinde i\u015fveren ad\u0131na hareket eden ve i\u015fin ve i\u015fyerinin ve i\u015fletmenin y\u00f6netiminde g\u00f6rev alan i\u015fveren vekili konumunda bulundu\u011fu, ayn\u0131 madde metninde ifade edildi\u011fi \u00fczere, i\u015fveren vekilinin bu s\u0131fatla i\u015f\u00e7ilere kar\u015f\u0131 muamele ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinden do\u011frudan i\u015fverenin sorumlu oldu\u011fu hususu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda, i\u015fveren vekili olan … y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n husumetten reddi gerekir iken, \u00f6denmeyen \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131ndan m\u00fc\u015ftereken ve m\u00fcteselsilen sorumlu tutulmas\u0131 hatal\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.
Sonu\u00e7:
Temyiz olunan karar\u0131n yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 sebepten dolay\u0131 BOZULMASINA<\/strong>, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde ilgiliye iadesine, 08.03.2021 <\/strong>tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"