Esas No:2021\/695<\/strong> 9. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/695 E. , 2021\/6288 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n MAHKEMES\u0130<\/strong> :\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi<\/p>\n\n\n\n Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili ile daval\u0131lardan … vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I<\/p>\n\n\n\n Davac\u0131 \u0130steminin \u00d6zeti: T.C.Yarg\u0131tay9. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2021\/695Karar No:2021\/6288K. Tarihi: 9. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/695 E. , 2021\/6288 K. MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi davac\u0131 vekili ile daval\u0131lardan … vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: Y…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[63],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10714"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10714"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10714\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10715,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10714\/revisions\/10715"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10714"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10714"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10714"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Karar No:2021\/6288<\/strong>
K. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Davac\u0131 vekili, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 Bakanl\u0131\u011fa ba\u011fl\u0131 okulda a\u015f\u00e7\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131lar aras\u0131nda as\u0131l i\u015fveren alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisi bulundu\u011funu, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan hakl\u0131 bir sebep olmadan feshedildi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma, hafta tatili ile ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccretlerinin \u00f6denmedi\u011fini beyan ederek k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 ile birlikte bir k\u0131s\u0131m i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.
Daval\u0131 Cevab\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:
Daval\u0131lar davan\u0131n reddi gerekti\u011fini savunmu\u015ftur.
Mahkeme Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:
Mahkemece, (kapat\u0131lan) 22. Hukuk Dairesinin 23.01.2020 tarih, 2016\/27351 esas 2020\/1100 karar say\u0131l\u0131 bozma ilam\u0131na uyularak yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.
Temyiz Ba\u015fvurusu:<\/strong>
Karar, yasal s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 vekili ile daval\u0131 … vekilince temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.
Gerek\u00e7e:
1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara toplanan delillerle karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanuni gerektirici sebeplere g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 … vekilinin t\u00fcm, davac\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentlerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir.
2-Taraflar aras\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccretine hak kazan\u0131p kazanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusudur.
Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta mahkemece verilen ilk karar (kapat\u0131lan) 22. Hukuk Dairesince, davac\u0131n\u0131n be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresince hi\u00e7 izin kullanmamas\u0131n\u0131n hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun 31. maddesi de dikkate al\u0131narak davac\u0131 asilin bu konudaki beyan\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve olu\u015facak sonuca g\u00f6re h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi noktas\u0131nda bozulmu\u015ftur. Bozmaya uyularak yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda, ‘davac\u0131n\u0131n 16\/09\/2020 tarihli celsede imzas\u0131yla tastik etti\u011fi beyan\u0131nda ‘birka\u00e7 g\u00fcn haz\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131p yard\u0131mc\u0131ma da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m b\u0131rakarak izin kullanabildim’ beyan\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda hi\u00e7 y\u0131ll\u0131k izin kullanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tezinin \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve davac\u0131 vekilinin bu haliyle dava dilek\u00e7esinde y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 somut ve sarih delillerle ispat edemedi\u011fi’ gerek\u00e7esi ile y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti talebi reddedilmi\u015f ise de, mahkemece ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7 hatal\u0131d\u0131r. Bozma karar\u0131na uyulmakla bozmaya uygun ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunlulu\u011fu do\u011far. Y\u0131ll\u0131k iznin kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yahut kullan\u0131lmayan izin s\u00fcresine ait \u00fccretin \u00f6dendi\u011finin ispat y\u00fck\u00fc i\u015fverene aittir. Di\u011fer taraftan \u00f6zellikle davac\u0131n\u0131n dava dilek\u00e7esinde y\u0131ll\u0131k izne y\u00f6nelik iddias\u0131n\u0131 somutla\u015ft\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, t\u00fcm \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi boyunca hi\u00e7 y\u0131ll\u0131k izin kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik do\u011frudan bir kabul, hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, hakimin davay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmal\u0131, bu y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck kapsam\u0131nda davac\u0131 asil \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lmal\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde izin kullan\u0131p kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kullanm\u0131\u015f ise hangi d\u00f6nemlerde y\u0131ll\u0131k izin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131, iznin d\u00f6nemi ve s\u00fcresi davac\u0131ya sorularak a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmal\u0131, olu\u015facak sonuca g\u00f6re y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti talebi ile ilgili bir karar verilmelidir. 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 31. maddesine g\u00f6re ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmas\u0131, y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccretinin ispat\u0131nda, ispat y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fcn yer de\u011fi\u015ftirmesi olarak yorumlanamaz. Mahkemece bozmaya uyulmu\u015f ise de, bozmaya konu kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn somut olaya uygulanmas\u0131nda hataya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesi yerinde de\u011fildir. Bu itibarla davac\u0131 asil yeniden \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lmal\u0131, bozma karar\u0131nda i\u015faret edilen y\u00f6nlerden yeniden ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmak suretiyle, davac\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccretine hak kazan\u0131p kazanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda bir sonuca var\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.
3-Taraflar aras\u0131nda \u0131slah\u0131n s\u00fcresinde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir ba\u015fka uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusudur.
Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme B\u00fcy\u00fck Genel Kurulunun 04\/02\/1959 g\u00fcn ve 1957\/13 esas, 1959\/5 karar, ve 09\/05\/1960 g\u00fcn ve 1960\/21 esas, 1960\/9 say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tayca maddi hata sonucu verilen bir karara mahkemece uyulmas\u0131na karar verilmesi halinde dahi usul\u00fc kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hak olu\u015fmaz ve Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n hatal\u0131 bozma karar\u0131ndan d\u00f6n\u00fclmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.
Kapat\u0131lan 22. Hukuk Dairesinin 23.01.2020 tarih, 2016\/27351 esas 2020\/1100 karar tarihli bozma ilam\u0131nda \u0131slah i\u015fleminin yasal s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f bulundu\u011fu, buna g\u00f6re mahkemece \u0131slah\u0131n s\u00fcresinde yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak, talep konusu alacaklar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u0131slah i\u015flemi hi\u00e7 yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f gibi h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile bozma karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f ise de, Dairemizce konunun yeniden ele al\u0131nmas\u0131 neticesinde; k\u0131smen \u0131slah h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun 181. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen kesin s\u00fcrenin, duru\u015fmada tutana\u011fa ge\u00e7irilmek suretiyle yap\u0131lan \u0131slah i\u015flemine ili\u015fkin usul i\u015flemlerinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 har\u00e7 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan tamamlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in verilmesi gereken bir s\u00fcre oldu\u011fu, bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u0131slah i\u015flemi i\u00e7in verilen s\u00fcrelerin Kanunun 181. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen kesin s\u00fcreye tabi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tahkikat sona erinceye dek \u0131slah i\u015flemi yap\u0131labilece\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015f olup, buna g\u00f6re ise davac\u0131n\u0131n \u0131slah i\u015fleminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkemece \u00f6nceki maddi hataya dayal\u0131 bozma ilam\u0131na uyularak verilen karar isabetli bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a yap\u0131lan \u0131slah i\u015fleminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc gerekmektedir. Temyiz edilen karar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeple de bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.
Sonu\u00e7:<\/strong> Temyiz olunan h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerden BOZULMASINA<\/strong>, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde davac\u0131 tarafa iadesine, 16.03.2021 <\/strong>tarihinde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"