{"id":10703,"date":"2022-06-14T13:55:56","date_gmt":"2022-06-14T13:55:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/?p=10703"},"modified":"2022-06-14T13:55:59","modified_gmt":"2022-06-14T13:55:59","slug":"yargitay-9-hukuk-dairesi-2021-2470-e-2021-6829-k","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2022\/06\/14\/yargitay-9-hukuk-dairesi-2021-2470-e-2021-6829-k\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/2470 E. 2021\/6829 K."},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>T.C.<br>Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol start=\"9\"><li>Hukuk Dairesi<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>Esas No:2021\/2470<br>Karar No:2021\/6829<br>K. Tarihi:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol start=\"9\"><li>Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/2470 E. , 2021\/6829 K.<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi taraf vekillerince istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Y A R G I T A Y K A R A R I<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Davac\u0131 \u0130steminin \u00d6zeti:<br>Davac\u0131 vekili; m\u00fcvekkilinin i\u015f akdinin haks\u0131z nedenle fesh edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 ile fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma, hafta tatili, y\u0131ll\u0131k izin, ulusal bayram genel tatil alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n ve k\u00f6t\u00fc niyet tazminat\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsilini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<br>Daval\u0131 Cevab\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:<br>Daval\u0131 vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<br>Mahkeme Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:<br>Mahkemece, bozma ilam\u0131, toplanan deliller ve bilirki\u015fi raporuna g\u00f6re, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<br>Temyiz:<br>Karar s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<br>Gerek\u00e7e:<br>1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara toplanan delillerle karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanuni gerektirici sebeplere ve temyiz sebeplerine g\u00f6re, daval\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm, davac\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir.<br>2- Dairemiz uygulamas\u0131nda, takdiri indirim ile ilgili olarak Avukatl\u0131k Asgari \u00dccret Tarifesinde bir kurala yer verilmedi\u011finden ve ayr\u0131ca i\u015f\u00e7inin davas\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya \u0131slah yoluyla dava konusunu artt\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u015famada Mahkemece ne miktarda indirim yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 bilinemedi\u011finden, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti alacaklar\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan takdiri indirimlerden dolay\u0131 reddine karar verilen miktar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan kendisini vekille temsil ettirmi\u015f olan daval\u0131 yarar\u0131na vek\u00e2let \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilemeyece\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<br>Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta, davac\u0131n\u0131n alacak taleplerinden 5,00 TL&#8217;lik k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131, 5,00 TL&#8217;lik ihbar tazminat\u0131, 5,00 TL&#8217;lik k\u00f6t\u00fc niyet tazminat\u0131 ve 5,00 TL&#8217;lik y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131 talepleri reddedilmi\u015f olup, takdiri indirim hari\u00e7 ret miktar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden daval\u0131 lehine verilecek olan vekalet \u00fccreti reddedilen miktar\u0131 ge\u00e7emeyece\u011finden Avukatl\u0131k Asgari \u00dccret Tarifesi&#8217;nin 13\/2 maddesine g\u00f6re 20,00 TL daval\u0131 lehine vekalet \u00fccreti takdir edilmesi gerekirken, 746,85 TL vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmesi isabetli olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<br>Yukar\u0131da yer alan hatal\u0131 y\u00f6n, bozma sebebi ise de, hatan\u0131n giderilmesi yeniden yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 gerektirmedi\u011finden, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca halen y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan m\u00fclga 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun 438\/7. maddesi uyar\u0131nca h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fekilde d\u00fczeltilerek onanmas\u0131 uygun bulunmu\u015ftur.<br>SONU\u00c7: Temyize konu karar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n 8. bendi silinerek yerine &#8216;Daval\u0131, dava ve duru\u015fmada kendini bir vekille temsil ettirdi\u011finden karar tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan Avukatl\u0131k Asgari \u00dccret Tarifesi&#8217;nin 13\/2 maddesi dikkate al\u0131narak hesaplanan 20,00 TL. nispi vekalet \u00fccretinin davac\u0131dan al\u0131narak daval\u0131ya verilmesine,&#8217; rakam ve s\u00f6zc\u00fcklerinin yaz\u0131larak; h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu \u015fekliyle D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK ONANMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde davac\u0131 tarafa iadesine, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 temyiz giderinin daval\u0131 tarafa y\u00fckletilmesine, 24.03.2021 tarihinde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C.Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2021\/2470Karar No:2021\/6829K. Tarihi: Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/2470 E. , 2021\/6829 K. MAHKEMES\u0130 :\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen karar\u0131n, temyizen incelenmesi taraf vekillerince istenilmekle, temyiz taleplerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: Y A R G I T&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[63],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10703"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10703"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10703\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10704,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10703\/revisions\/10704"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10703"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10703"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10703"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}