{"id":10531,"date":"2021-01-07T09:09:35","date_gmt":"2021-01-07T09:09:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/?p=10531"},"modified":"2021-01-07T09:10:48","modified_gmt":"2021-01-07T09:10:48","slug":"maktulden-saniga-yonelik-hukukca-gecerli-tahrik-olusturan-bir-soz-ve-davranis-bulunmadigi-halde-haksiz-tahrik-indirimi-yapilmamasi-gerekir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2021\/01\/07\/maktulden-saniga-yonelik-hukukca-gecerli-tahrik-olusturan-bir-soz-ve-davranis-bulunmadigi-halde-haksiz-tahrik-indirimi-yapilmamasi-gerekir\/","title":{"rendered":"Maktulden san\u0131\u011fa y\u00f6nelik hukuk\u00e7a ge\u00e7erli tahrik olu\u015fturan bir s\u00f6z ve davran\u0131\u015f bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde haks\u0131z tahrik indirimi yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 gerekir"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

\n

T.C.
\nYarg\u0131tay
\n1. Ceza Dairesi<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Esas No:2014\/3811<\/strong>
\nKarar No:2014\/6533<\/strong>
\nK. Tarihi:<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

1-a) Kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasaya muhalefet su\u00e7undan a\u00e7\u0131lan davaya kat\u0131lma ve bu su\u00e7tan kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fc temyize yetkisi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin bu su\u00e7a y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin CMUK\u2019nun 317.maddesi uyar\u0131nca reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.
\nb) San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasaya muhalefet su\u00e7undan verilen d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131n\u0131, temyizde hukuki yarar\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin gerek\u00e7eye de y\u00f6nelik olmayan temyiz isteminin CMUK\u2019nun 317. maddesi uyar\u0131nca reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

2- San\u0131k Nedret hakk\u0131nda maktul Fatih\u2019e y\u00f6nelik kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Toplanan deliller karar yerinde incelenip, san\u0131k Nedret\u2019in maktul Fatih\u2019e y\u00f6nelik eyleminin s\u00fcbutu kabul, takdire ili\u015fen cezay\u0131 azalt\u0131c\u0131 sebebin niteli\u011fi takdir k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, savunmalar\u0131 inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle reddedilmi\u015f, incelenen dosyaya g\u00f6re bozmaya uyularak verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmde bozma nedenleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f oldu\u011fundan, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin s\u00fcbuta, kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin h\u00fckmolunan cezaya y\u00f6nelen ve yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine;
\nDosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re; san\u0131k Nedret’in k\u0131z\u0131 \u0130pek’in maktul Fatih ile iki y\u0131la yak\u0131n arkada\u015fl\u0131k yapt\u0131klar\u0131, bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde \u0130pek’in maktul\u00fcn arkada\u015f\u0131 Ta\u015fk\u0131n ile de tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, makt\u00fcl ile \u0130pek’in ayr\u0131lmas\u0131ndan bir s\u00fcre sonra, Ta\u015fk\u0131n’\u0131n, y\u00fcr\u00fcyerek bilgisayar kursuna gitmekte olan \u0130pek’i gidece\u011fi yere b\u0131rakmak bahanesiyle arac\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak tenha bir yere g\u00f6t\u00fcrerek onunla cinsel ili\u015fkiye girmek istedi\u011fi, \u0130pek’in kabul etmemesi ve a\u011flamas\u0131 \u00fczerine niyetinden vazge\u00e7ti\u011fi, \u0130pek’in durumu ailesine anlatmas\u0131 \u00fczerine, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ta\u015fk\u0131n’dan \u015fikayet\u00e7i oldu\u011fu, ancak Ta\u015fk\u0131n’\u0131n yakalanamamas\u0131 nedeniyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ta\u015fk\u0131n’\u0131 kendi \u00e7abalar\u0131yla aramaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu hususta maktulden de faydalanmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, maktul\u00fcn de san\u0131\u011fa yard\u0131m etmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak maktul ile Ta\u015fk\u0131n’\u0131n birlikte ara\u00e7la gezdi\u011finin g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi \u00fczerine, hakk\u0131nda beraat karar\u0131 kesinle\u015fen B\u00fclent’in maktul ve Ta\u015fk\u0131n’\u0131n polise g\u00f6t\u00fcrmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken, maktul\u00fcn araca benzin almak bahanesiyle benzinli\u011fe girdi\u011finde ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131, Ta\u015fk\u0131n’\u0131n da bir f\u0131rsat\u0131n\u0131 bularak B\u00fclent’in elinden ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ta\u015fk\u0131n’\u0131 aramaya devam etti\u011fi, maktul\u00fc de Ta\u015fk\u0131n’\u0131n ka\u00e7mas\u0131ndan sorumlu tuttu\u011fu, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc san\u0131k ile kimli\u011fi belirsiz ki\u015filerin maktul\u00fcn arkada\u015f\u0131 olan tan\u0131k Sami’yi arabalar\u0131na alarak Ta\u015fk\u0131n’\u0131 evinden arad\u0131klar\u0131, bulamay\u0131nca Sami vas\u0131tas\u0131yla maktul\u00fcn evine gittikleri, maktul\u00fcn evden \u00e7\u0131kmadan \u00f6nce bir ka\u011f\u0131da “\u0130pe\u011fin babas\u0131, o adamlar geldi anne” notunu yaz\u0131p terlik ve pijamas\u0131yla a\u015fa\u011f\u0131ya indi\u011fi, ertesi sabah Buca Kaynaklar Beldesi Kavac\u0131k Mevkisinde tabanca ile \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olarak bulundu\u011fu olayda;
\na) Maktulden san\u0131\u011fa y\u00f6nelik hukuk\u00e7a ge\u00e7erli tahrik olu\u015fturan bir s\u00f6z ve davran\u0131\u015f bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde, “san\u0131\u011f\u0131n geli\u015fen olaylar\u0131n maktul F. T. ile i\u015fbirli\u011fi i\u00e7erisinde oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve \u00f6ld\u00fcrme eylemini bunun etkisi ile ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi”nden ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, k\u0131z\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131na gelenlerden Fatih’i sorumlu tuttu\u011fundan bahisle soyut gerek\u00e7elerle san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda haks\u0131z tahrik h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulanarak eksik ceza tayini,
\nb) Gerek\u00e7eli kararda “san\u0131k Nedret’in a\u00e7\u0131k kimlikleri belirlenemeyen ki\u015fileri taamm\u00fcden \u00f6ld\u00fcrme konusunda azmettirdi\u011fi, olayda tasarlaman\u0131n unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131” \u015feklinde \u00e7eli\u015fkili ifadeler yan\u0131nda lehe olan Yasa kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131n da 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK y\u00f6n\u00fcnden tasarlayarak \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan 450\/4 maddesi il
\n5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nun 82\/1-a maddeleri gere\u011fince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nun 450\/4 ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019nun 81\/1.maddesi aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lmak suretiyle \u00e7eli\u015fkiye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesi,
\nBozmay\u0131 gerektirmekle, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii ile kat\u0131lan vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenle yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, h\u00fckm\u00fcn tebli\u011fnamedeki d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceye uygun olarak (BOZULMASINA), 23\/12\/2014 tarihinde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/div>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text] T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesi Esas No:2014\/3811 Karar No:2014\/6533 K. Tarihi: 1-a) Kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasaya muhalefet su\u00e7undan a\u00e7\u0131lan davaya kat\u0131lma ve bu su\u00e7tan kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fc temyize yetkisi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin bu su\u00e7a y\u00f6nelik temyiz isteminin CMUK\u2019nun 317.maddesi uyar\u0131nca reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. b) San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasaya muhalefet su\u00e7undan verilen d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131n\u0131, temyizde…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[58],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10531"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10531"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10531\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10533,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10531\/revisions\/10533"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10531"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10531"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10531"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}