{"id":10476,"date":"2020-12-15T10:48:36","date_gmt":"2020-12-15T10:48:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/?p=10476"},"modified":"2020-12-15T10:50:11","modified_gmt":"2020-12-15T10:50:11","slug":"maktul-sen-sinek-bile-vuramazsin-adammisin-seklinde-soylemde-bulunmasi-uzerine-sanigin-av-tufegiyle-yakin-atis-mesafesinden-maktule-bir-kez-ates-etmesi-alt-sinirdan-ceza-verilmesi-geregi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/2020\/12\/15\/maktul-sen-sinek-bile-vuramazsin-adammisin-seklinde-soylemde-bulunmasi-uzerine-sanigin-av-tufegiyle-yakin-atis-mesafesinden-maktule-bir-kez-ates-etmesi-alt-sinirdan-ceza-verilmesi-geregi\/","title":{"rendered":"Makt\u00fcl “sen sinek bile vuramazs\u0131n adamm\u0131s\u0131n” \u015feklinde s\u00f6ylemde bulunmas\u0131 \u00fczerine san\u0131\u011f\u0131n av t\u00fcfe\u011fiyle yak\u0131n at\u0131\u015f mesafesinden makt\u00fcle bir kez ate\u015f etmesi -alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan ceza verilmesi gere\u011fi"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

\n

T.C.
\nYarg\u0131tay
\n1. Ceza Dairesi<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

Esas No:2014\/4340<\/strong>
\nKarar No:2014\/6752<\/strong>
\nK. Tarihi:30.12.2014<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

1- ) San\u0131k Zeki m\u00fcdaf\u0131inin s\u00fcresinden sonra ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen duru\u015fmal\u0131 inceleme isteminin CMUK’nun 318. maddesi gere\u011fince reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.
\nB-) Recep hakk\u0131nda ma\u011fdur Zeki\u2019ye y\u00f6nelik tehdit ve hakaret su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan verilen “h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na dair karar, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK.nun 231\/12. maddesi uyar\u0131nca itiraz yoluna tabi olup, san\u0131k Recep m\u00fcdafiinin itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine Boyabat A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin 17.06.2013 tarih ve 2013\/201 D.\u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile verilen itiraz\u0131n reddine dair karar CMK.nun 271\/4. maddesine g\u00f6re kesin nitelikte olup temyiz yasa yoluna ba\u011fl\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131k Recep hakk\u0131nda yukar\u0131da belirtilen su\u00e7lardan kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmler inceleme d\u0131\u015f\u0131 b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
\n2- A) Karar tarihi 26.04.2013 oldu\u011fu halde, h\u00fckm\u00fcn verildi\u011fi son celseye ait duru\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131 ve gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n sonunda 24.04.2013 tarihinin yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 mahallinde d\u00fczeltilebilir yaz\u0131m hatas\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.
\nB-) Toplanan deliller karar yerinde incelenip, san\u0131k Zeki’nin makt\u00fcl Hasan’\u0131 kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7u ile ma\u011fdur Recep’e y\u00f6nelik \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye te\u015febb\u00fcs su\u00e7unun s\u00fcbutu kabul, olu\u015fa ve soru\u015fturma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na uygun \u015fekilde su\u00e7lar\u0131n niteli\u011fi tayin, bozma nedeni sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131yla tahrike ve takdire ili\u015fen cezay\u0131 azalt\u0131c\u0131 sebeplerin nitelik ve derecesi takdir k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, savunmas\u0131 inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f, incelenen dosyaya g\u00f6re verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerde ele\u015ftiri ve bozma nedenleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f oldu\u011fundan, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin eksik incelemeye, haks\u0131z tahrik indiriminin az oldu\u011funa ili\u015fen, kat\u0131lan Recep, Ramazan ve Hamza vekilinin su\u00e7un niteli\u011fine y\u00f6nelen ve yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine,
\nAncak;
\nOlu\u015fa ve dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re; San\u0131k Zeki ile makt\u00fcl Hasan ve ma\u011fdur Recep’in ayn\u0131 k\u00f6yde ikamet ettikleri ve aralar\u0131nda yolun kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 konusunda anla\u015fmazl\u0131k bulundu\u011fu, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc karde\u015f olan makt\u00fcl ve ma\u011fdurun kendilerine ait ara\u00e7la san\u0131\u011f\u0131n evinin 200 metre uza\u011f\u0131ndaki tarlalar\u0131na gidip \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, tarlada \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken y\u00fcksek sesle san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda k\u00fcf\u00fcrl\u00fc konu\u015ftuklar\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n makt\u00fcl ve ma\u011fdurun ara\u00e7lar\u0131yla d\u00f6nd\u00fckleri esnada makt\u00fcl ve ma\u011fduru durdurarak av t\u00fcfe\u011fini do\u011frulttu\u011fu, makt\u00fcl “sen sinek bile vuramazs\u0131n adamm\u0131s\u0131n” \u015feklinde s\u00f6ylemde bulunmas\u0131 \u00fczerine san\u0131\u011f\u0131n av t\u00fcfe\u011fiyle yak\u0131n at\u0131\u015f mesafesinden makt\u00fcle bir kez ate\u015f etti\u011fi, makt\u00fcl\u00fcn olay yerinde \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, ma\u011fdur Recep’in san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine y\u00fcr\u00fcmesi \u00fczerine san\u0131\u011f\u0131n elindeki av t\u00fcfe\u011fini ma\u011fdura do\u011frultarak “seni de vururum” dedi\u011fi, bunun \u00fczerine ma\u011fdurun ka\u00e7maya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n av t\u00fcfe\u011fi ile ma\u011fdura da bir el ate\u015f etti\u011fi, ancak ma\u011fdurun petrol arama \u00e7ukuruna atlayarak ka\u00e7mas\u0131 \u00fczerine eyleminin tamamlayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 olayda;
\naa-) San\u0131k Zeki hakk\u0131nda ma\u011fdur Recep’e y\u00f6nelik \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye te\u015febb\u00fcs su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden;
\naaa-) 13 y\u0131ldan 20 y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6ren TCK\u2019nun 35. maddesi uyar\u0131nca meydana gelen zarar ve tehlikenin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve g\u00f6re, alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan ceza verilmesi yerine, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde 12 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmedilerek fazla ceza tayini,
\nbbb-) Ma\u011fdurdan gelen haks\u0131z tahrik te\u015fkil eden eylemin ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 boyuta g\u00f6re, 1\/4 den 3\/4’e kadar ceza indirimi \u00f6ng\u00f6ren TCK\u2019nun 29. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, haks\u0131z tahrik nedeniyle alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan indirim uygulanmas\u0131 yerine yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde 1\/3 indirim yap\u0131larak eksik ceza tayini,
\nbb-) San\u0131k Zeki hakk\u0131nda makt\u00fcl Hasan’a y\u00f6nelik kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcm y\u00f6n\u00fcnden;
\nMakt\u00fcl\u00fcn, san\u0131\u011fa hakaret etmesinden ibaret haks\u0131z tahrik olu\u015fturan eyleminin niteli\u011fi ve ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 boyut dikkate al\u0131narak; 12 y\u0131ldan 18 y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6ren TCK.nun 29. maddesi ile yap\u0131lan uygulama s\u0131ras\u0131nda alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan indirim uygulanmas\u0131 yerine, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde 22 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmedilerek fazla ceza tayini,
\ncc-) T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasas\u0131’n\u0131n 90. maddesinin son f\u0131kras\u0131 ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 6\/3-c maddesi gere\u011fince, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’nun 150, 234 ve 239. maddeleri ile 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 13. maddesine dayan\u0131larak haz\u0131rlanan Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu gere\u011fince M\u00fcdafii ve Vekillerin G\u00f6revlendirilmeleri ile Yap\u0131lacak \u00d6demelerin Usul ve Esaslar\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 8. maddesi gere\u011fince san\u0131k i\u00e7in Baro taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6revlendirilen zorunlu m\u00fcdafii \u00fccretinin san\u0131ktan al\u0131nmas\u0131na h\u00fckmedilemeyece\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeksizin, yaz\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde zorunlu m\u00fcdafii \u00fccretinin san\u0131ktan tahsiline karar verilmesi,
\nBozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f olup, san\u0131k Zeki m\u00fcdafii ile kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenle yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden k\u0131smen re’sen de temyize tabi olan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin k\u0131smen tebli\u011fnamedeki d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce gibi (BOZULMASINA), 30\/12\/2014 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/div>\n

.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Makt\u00fcl\u00fcn, san\u0131\u011fa hakaret etmesinden ibaret haks\u0131z tahrik olu\u015fturan eyleminin niteli\u011fi ve ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 boyut dikkate al\u0131narak; 12 y\u0131ldan 18 y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6ren TCK.nun 29. maddesi ile yap\u0131lan uygulama s\u0131ras\u0131nda alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan indirim uygulanmas\u0131 yerine, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde 22 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmedilerek fazla ceza tayini,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[58],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10476"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10476"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10476\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10478,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10476\/revisions\/10478"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10476"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10476"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10476"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}