[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n
Esas No:2009\/8257<\/strong> E.A.’\u0131 kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmekten ve izinsiz silah ta\u015f\u0131maktan san\u0131k E.\u00c7., i\u015fbu su\u00e7a yard\u0131mdan san\u0131klar R.K., E.\u00c7., M.\u00c7. ve D.\u00c7. su\u00e7 delillerini gizlemekten san\u0131k F.S.’n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lanmalar\u0131 sonunda; h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerine ili\u015fkin Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nden verilen 12.02.2009 g\u00fcn ve 64\/43 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi san\u0131klar m\u00fcdafileri ile m\u00fcdahil vekili taraflar\u0131ndan istenilmi\u015f ve h\u00fck\u00fcm k\u0131smen resen de temyize tabi bulunmu\u015f oldu\u011fundan dava dosyas\u0131 C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’ndan tebli\u011fname ile Dairemize g\u00f6nderilmekle; incelendi ve a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki karar tesbit edildi.<\/p>\n T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA<\/p>\n S.E.’\u0131n kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, san\u0131klar R., S., M., E. ve D.’\u0131n kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7una yard\u0131m, san\u0131k F.’un su\u00e7 delillerini gizleme su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahkumiyetlerine dair kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n Toplanan deliller karar yerinde incelenip, san\u0131klar\u0131n su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcbutu kabul olu\u015fa ve kovu\u015fturma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na uygun \u015fekilde su\u00e7lar\u0131n nitelikleri tayin, takdire ili\u015fen cezay\u0131 azalt\u0131c\u0131 sebebinin niteli\u011fi takdir k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, savunmalar\u0131 inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle de\u011ferlendirilip reddedilmi\u015f, incelenen dosyaya g\u00f6re verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerde bozma nedenleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f oldu\u011fundan, san\u0131klar E., M., E. ve D. m\u00fcdafiinin s\u00fcbuta me\u015fru savunmaya y\u00f6nelen, san\u0131k R. m\u00fcdafiinin s\u00fcbuta ili\u015fen, san\u0131k Salih m\u00fcdafiinin s\u00fcbuta su\u00e7 niteli\u011fine y\u00f6nelen, san\u0131k F. ve m\u00fcdafiinin yetersiz gerek\u00e7eye su\u00e7 kast\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na verilen cezada TCK’n\u0131n 281\/3 ve CMK’nun 231. maddelerinin uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine, vesaireye ili\u015fen, kat\u0131lan Tahir vekilinin san\u0131klar\u0131n tasarlayarak \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 gerekti\u011fine y\u00f6nelen ve yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle,<\/p>\n 1- \u00a0 \u00a0San\u0131k F.’un su\u00e7 delillerini gizleme su\u00e7undan mahkumiyetine dair kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn tebli\u011fnamedeki d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce gibi ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n 2- \u00a0 \u00a0Olu\u015fa, dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine ve kabule g\u00f6re; olay tarihinde san\u0131k E.’\u0131n babas\u0131 M., amcas\u0131 E., arkada\u015flar\u0131 R., S. ve D’\u0131n, Turgut Reis Park\u0131’nda arkada\u015flar\u0131yla gezen maktul\u00fcn yan\u0131na gittikleri san\u0131k Do\u011fan\u0131n k\u00fcf\u00fcr ederek demir sopayla san\u0131k E.\u00fcn pompal\u0131 t\u00fcfekle san\u0131k M.’n\u0131n sat\u0131rla, san\u0131klar R. ve S.’in ise b\u0131\u00e7aklarla sald\u0131rarak maktule birlikte vurduklar\u0131, san\u0131k E.’\u0131n ise yere d\u00fc\u015fen maktule tabancayla ate\u015f ederek \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, daha sonra san\u0131klar\u0131n birlikte ka\u00e7arak olay yerinden uzakla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 olayda:<\/p>\n a) \u00a0 \u00a0San\u0131klar M., E., R., S. ve D.’\u0131n di\u011fer san\u0131k E’la birlikte karar ve irade birli\u011fi i\u00e7erisinde ve fiil \u00fczerinde ortak hakimiyet kurarak su\u00e7u i\u015fledikleri anla\u015f\u0131lmakla 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 37. maddesi uyar\u0131nca m\u00fc\u015fterek fail olarak cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 yerine, yard\u0131m eden olarak TCK’n\u0131n 39. maddesi uyar\u0131nca uygulama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle eksik ceza tayini,<\/p>\n b) \u00a0 \u00a0San\u0131klar E., R., S., M., E. ve D. ile maktul E.’\u0131n kom\u015fu olduklar\u0131 ve birbirlerini tan\u0131d\u0131klar\u0131 san\u0131k E’\u00fcn olay tarihinden be\u015f g\u00fcn \u00f6nce kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131nda maktul\u00fcn kendisine sata\u015f\u0131p k\u00fcfretti\u011fini, neden k\u00fcfretti\u011fini sordu\u011funda ise \u00fczerine y\u00fcr\u00fcyerek k\u00fcf\u00fcrlerine devam etti\u011fini, kendisini takip ederek i\u015fyerine girdi\u011fi s\u0131rada kom\u015fular\u0131n kendilerini ay\u0131rd\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemesi, san\u0131klar E., D. ve R.’n\u0131n olay tarihinden bir g\u00fcn \u00f6nce kiralad\u0131klar\u0131 ara\u00e7la gece vaktinde gezerken maktul\u00fcn ara\u00e7lar\u0131 durdurarak k\u00fcf\u00fcr etmeye ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, ara\u00e7tan D. ve R.’\u0131 indirdi\u011finin, E.’\u0131n sa\u00e7\u0131ndan tutarak surat\u0131na yumrukla vurdu\u011funun araca zorla binerek kullanmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n arka koltu\u011fa oturan E.’dan para istedi\u011finin ve cep telefonunu zorla ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, daha sonra maktul\u00fcn arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n araya girmesi \u00fczerine telefonunu geri verdi\u011finin, E.’\u0131n kiralad\u0131klar\u0131 arac\u0131 sahibine b\u0131rakt\u0131ktan sonra evine gitti\u011finin gece saat 02.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda makt\u00fcl\u00fcn, evlerinin \u00f6n\u00fcne gelmesi \u00fczerine san\u0131klar E. ve M. ile kom\u015fular\u0131 olan san\u0131klar R., S. ve D.’\u0131n da d\u0131\u015far\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maktul\u00fcn san\u0131klara b\u0131\u00e7ak savurdu\u011funun ve tehdit ederek oradan ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maktul\u00fcn ayn\u0131 gece saat 04.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda san\u0131k M.’n\u0131n evinin \u00f6n\u00fcnde park etti\u011fi m\u00fcn\u00fcb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn camlar\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131rarak, lastiklerini kesti\u011finin, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc ise internet kafede oyun oynayan san\u0131klar E. ve D.’\u0131n enselerine tokatla vurdu\u011funun iddia edilmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, gerekli ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131larak san\u0131klar E, M., E., R., S. ve D. y\u00f6n\u00fcnden olayda haks\u0131z tahrik bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n var ise boyutlar\u0131n\u0131n tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ve sonucuna g\u00f6re uygulama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi,<\/p>\n c) \u00a0 \u00a0San\u0131klar M. ve E.’\u00fcn n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131na uygun olmayan adli sicil kay\u0131tlar\u0131na itibar edilerek h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n d) \u00a0 \u00a0San\u0131k E.’\u0131n 6136 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden,<\/p>\n Su\u00e7 tarihinden sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5728 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa’n\u0131n 562. maddesi ile de\u011fi\u015ftirilen 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 231. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131nda ceza miktar\u0131n\u0131n \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n 2 y\u0131la \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131 soru\u015fturulmas\u0131 ve kovu\u015fturulmas\u0131 \u015fikayete ba\u011fl\u0131 olan su\u00e7larla ilgili s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131rman\u0131n da kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle yerel mahkemece de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda zorunluluk bulunmas\u0131,<\/p>\n Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131klar E., M., E. ve D. m\u00fcdafii san\u0131k R. m\u00fcdafii san\u0131k S. m\u00fcdafii ve kat\u0131lan Tahir vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenlerle yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclerek, h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin CMUK. 321. madde gere\u011fince tebli\u011fnamedeki d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce gibi BOZULMASINA, 05.07.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Olayda haks\u0131z tahrik bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n var ise boyutlar\u0131n\u0131n tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ve sonucuna g\u00f6re uygulama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi hatal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[58],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10462","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-yargitay-ceza-daireleri-kararlari"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10462","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10462"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10462\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10464,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10462\/revisions\/10464"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10462"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10462"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10462"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nKarar No:2011\/4287<\/strong>
\nK. Tarihi:5.7.2011<\/strong><\/p>\n