[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n
Esas No:2011\/1535<\/strong> 1- San\u0131k \u0130. M\u00fcdafiinin yasal s\u00fcreden sonra olan duru\u015fmal\u0131 inceleme isteminin CMUK’un 318. maddesi gere\u011fince reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n 2- San\u0131k \u0130.nin olas\u0131 kastla \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma, san\u0131klar B.ve N.’nin ihmali davran\u0131\u015fla \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahkumiyetlerine dair kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n Toplanan deliller karar yerinde incelenip, san\u0131klar\u0131n su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fc-butu kabul, olu\u015fa ve kovu\u015fturma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na uygun \u015fekilde ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n niteli\u011fi tayin, takdire ve san\u0131k B.y\u00f6n\u00fcn-den tahrike ili\u015fen cezay\u0131 azalt\u0131c\u0131 sebeplerinin nitelik ve derecesi takdir k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, savunmalar\u0131 inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle de\u011ferlendirilip k\u0131smen reddedilmi\u015f, incelenen dosyaya g\u00f6re verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerde d\u00fczeltme ve bozma nedenleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f bulundu\u011fundan, san\u0131k \u0130. M\u00fcdafiinin me\u015fru savunmaya y\u00f6nelen, san\u0131klar B.ve O.m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde ve duru\u015fmal\u0131 incelemede, yetersiz gerek\u00e7eye, s\u00fcbuta, TCK’n\u0131n 98. maddesi gere\u011fince ceza tayin edilmesi gerekti\u011fine, haks\u0131z tahrik ve derecesine ili\u015fen, Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131k \u0130.’in kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine y\u00f6nelen ve yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle, San\u0131k \u0130.’in ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7undan mahkumiyetine dair kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmde, \u0130zmir 19. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 2004\/718 esas, 2005\/100 karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131ndaki daha a\u011f\u0131r ceza i\u00e7eren neticeten 2700 TL para cezas\u0131n\u0131n esas al\u0131narak tekerr\u00fcr uygulamas\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ile yetinilmesi gerekir iken ayn\u0131 ilamdaki az ceza i\u00e7eren h\u00fck\u00fcm i\u00e7in de m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejiminin uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi, yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 ise de bu husus yeniden yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 gerektirmedi\u011finden, CMUK’un 322. maddesindeki yetkiye dayan\u0131larak, 1345.61 TL a\u011f\u0131r para cezas\u0131 ile\u201d ibaresinin h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n mahsus b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmek suretiyle D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEN h\u00fck\u00fcm ile san\u0131klar B.ve N.’in ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7lar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin tebli\u011fnamedeki d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce gibi ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n San\u0131k \u0130.’nin olas\u0131 kas\u0131tla \u00f6ld\u00fcrme, san\u0131klar B.ve N.’in ihmali davran\u0131\u015fla \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahkumiyetlerine dair kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden; Olu\u015fa ve dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re; san\u0131k B’nin babas\u0131na ait otoparkta bek\u00e7i olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan ve olay tarihinde otoparkta alkol alan maktul Sa-pa’n\u0131n, san\u0131k B.’nin babas\u0131 A.’y\u0131 darp etti\u011fi, bunu \u00f6\u011frenen san\u0131k B.ile arkada\u015f\u0131 san\u0131k \u0130.’in maktul\u00fc yumruklar\u0131yla darp ettikleri ve san\u0131k B.’nin arkada\u015f\u0131 olan san\u0131k N.’de maktul\u00fcn darp edildi\u011fini g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc; san\u0131klar\u0131n, yabanc\u0131 uyruklu olup \u0130stanbul’u bilmeyen maktul\u00fc otoparktan alarak \u0131ss\u0131z bir yere b\u0131rakmaya karar verdikleri, san\u0131k B.’nin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 arac\u0131n \u00f6n koltu\u011funa san\u0131k N.’nin arka koltu\u011funa ise san\u0131k \u0130.ve maktul\u00fcn bindikleri, geceyar\u0131s\u0131na yak\u0131n bir saatte \u0130stanbul TEM Otoyolunun Mahmutbey gi\u015felerine yak\u0131n bir yerde san\u0131k B.’nin arac\u0131 durdurarak maktul\u00fcn inmesini istedi\u011fi, maktul\u00fcn ara\u00e7tan inmek istememesi \u00fczerine san\u0131k \u0130.’nin ara\u00e7tan inerek maktul\u00fc zorla ara\u00e7tan indirdi\u011fi, di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n ise ara\u00e7tan inmedikleri, san\u0131k \u0130. ve maktul aras\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kan tart\u0131\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda san\u0131k \u0130.’nin b\u0131\u00e7akla sa\u011f baca\u011f\u0131na bir kez, sol baca\u011f\u0131na alt\u0131 kez vurarak maktul\u00fc yaralad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ara\u00e7la oradan uzakla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, olay yeri yak\u0131n\u0131ndan ge\u00e7en \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerce sabah 07.30 sular\u0131nda hastaneye kald\u0131r\u0131lan maktul\u00fcn sa\u011f uyluk 1\/3 arka b\u00f6lgesine isabet eden b\u0131\u00e7ak darbesinin neden oldu\u011fu femoral arter yaralanmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 geli\u015fen komplikasyonlar sonucu \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, maktul\u00fcn sol uyluk b\u00f6lgesindeki di\u011fer alt\u0131 adet yaran\u0131n ise cilt, ciltalt\u0131 yumu\u015fak doku seyirli yaralar olup \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc nitelikte olmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi olayda; San\u0131k \u0130.’nin hedef alma imkan\u0131 olmas\u0131na ragmen maktul\u00fcn hayati b\u00f6lgesini hedef almamas\u0131, maktul ile aras\u0131nda \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeyi gerektirir husumet bulunmamas\u0131, engel neden bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde eylemini s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmemesi ve \u00f6ld\u00fcrme kast\u0131 ile hareket etti\u011fini g\u00f6steren kesin ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 kan\u0131t bulunmamas\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, san\u0131k \u0130. hakk\u0131nda kasten yaralama sonucu \u00f6l\u00fcme neden olmak su\u00e7undan TCK’nin 37\/1. maddesi delaletiyle TCK’nin 87\/4. maddesinin 2.c\u00fcmlesi gere\u011fince ve darbe say\u0131s\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak temel cezan\u0131n tayininde alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan da uzakla\u015f\u0131lmak suretiyle h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131; san\u0131klar B.veN.’\u0131n ise san\u0131k \u0130.ile fikir ve eylem birli\u011fi i\u00e7erisinde hareket ettiklerine ve fiil \u00fczerinde ortak hakimiyet kurduklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin kesin kan\u0131tlar bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak olay yerine birlikte gitmeleri ve maktul\u00fcn b\u0131\u00e7akland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rmelerine ragmen san\u0131k \u0130.’yi de alarak oradan uzakla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda eylemlerinin san\u0131k \u0130.’nin kasten yarala sonucu \u00f6l\u00fcme neden olmak su\u00e7una yard\u0131m etme su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 87\/4 ve 39. maddeleri gere\u011fince h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmeksizin, san\u0131k \u0130.’nin 81 ve 21\/2. maddeleri, san\u0131klar B.ve N.’nin ise 83\/2 b-3 maddesi gere\u011fince cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131na karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n San\u0131k \u0130.’nin adli sicil kayd\u0131na g\u00f6re; sab\u0131kas\u0131n\u0131n esas \u0130zmir 19. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 2004\/718 esas, 2005\/100 karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131ndaki daha a\u011f\u0131r ceza i\u00e7eren 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 258\/1, 647 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa’n\u0131n 4,5 ve 6. maddeleri gere\u011fince ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 neticeten 2700 TL. para cezas\u0131n\u0131n esas al\u0131narak tekerr\u00fcr uygulamas\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ile yetinilmesi gerekir iken ayn\u0131 ilamdaki daha az ceza i\u00e7eren 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 266\/1, 647 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa’n\u0131n 4,5 ve 6. maddeleri gere\u011fince ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 neticeten 1345.61 TL para cezas\u0131na ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcm i\u00e7in de m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejiminin uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131k \u0130. M\u00fcdafii, san\u0131klar B.ve N.m\u00fcdafii ve Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenlerle yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, k\u0131smen resen de temyize tabi bulunan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin farkl\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle tebli\u011fnamedeki d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce gibi BOZULMASINA, h\u00fckmolunan ceza ve tutuklulukta ge\u00e7en s\u00fcreler g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak san\u0131klar m\u00fcdafiilerinin tahliye taleplerinin reddine, 24.03.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" San\u0131\u011f\u0131n f\u0131rsat bulmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n makt\u00fcl\u00fcn sadece bacaklar\u0131n\u0131 b\u0131\u00e7aklamas\u0131 sonucu ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen \u00f6l\u00fcm, kasten yaralama sonucu ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen fiil olup alt cezay\u0131 gerektirir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10362,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[58],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10455","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-yargitay-ceza-daireleri-kararlari"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10455","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10455"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10455\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10457,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10455\/revisions\/10457"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10455"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10455"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.avrasyahukuk.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10455"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nKarar No:2011\/1737<\/strong>
\nK. Tarihi:24.3.2011<\/strong><\/p>\n